Subjective Versus Objective Evaluation of Hypnotic Efficacy: Experience with Zolpidem
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Objective Evaluation of Subjective Decisions
The Dempster-Shafer “theory of evidence” encompasses and extends the Bayes Theorem-based decision making machinery. Dempster-Shafer’s innovation is the introduction of lower and upper bounds, designated “belief” and “plausibility”, that are attached to probability estimates. The Dempster-Shafer algebra provides for propagation of and reasoning about these quantities according to an algebra whos...
متن کاملWebsite Complexity: Objective versus Subjective Measures
Site complexity has been defined both as a single construct and as multi-dimension construct and operationalized in terms of objective measures or user perceptions. In this research, we distinguish between objective and subjective (perceived) site complexity and examine the relationship between the two. Objective site complexity is measured by how varied a website is; subjective site complexity...
متن کاملObjective Evaluation of Subjective Driving Impressions
In the development of passenger car driving behaviour much subjective testing is involved. Although many car manufacturers have developed objective test methods and have corresponding analyses, objective parameters which correlate one to one with the subjective rating in the international rating scale (1-very bad .... 10-excellent) are not available. FEV has developed objective parameters for t...
متن کاملSubjective and Objective Evaluation of Conversational Agents
In this paper we present results from an investigation on correlations between subjective and objective evaluation metrics for young people using a conversational agent. The subjective evaluation metrics capture users’ experiences of different aspects of conversations with a virtual agent while the objective evaluation metrics are based on an analysis of the actual conversation between the user...
متن کاملSubjective vs. Objective Evaluation of Ontological Statements with Crowdsourcing
In this paper we propose and test a methodology for evaluation of statements of a multi-viewpoint ontology by crowdsourcing. The task for the workers was to assess each of the given statement as true statements, controversial viewpoint statement or error. Typically, in crowdsourcing experiments the workers are asked for their personal opinions on the given subject. However, in our case their ab...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Sleep
سال: 1991
ISSN: 0161-8105,1550-9109
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/14.5.399